Run a DPIA where residual risk recalculates the moment you add a control
Your residual risk stops being true the moment you mitigate
A DPIA is only as credible as the risk assessment behind it. When you score likelihood and damage across multiple scenarios by hand, the math drifts — and a supervisory authority finds the inconsistency before you do.
The harder problem comes after the assessment. You implement technical and organizational measures, but the residual-risk figure in your document still reflects the world before mitigation. The assessment stops describing reality the moment you act on it.
And when risk, mitigations, and consultation notes live in separate files, you can't show one current view of why a high-risk activity is now acceptable.
What you can do with DPIA
- Document the processing and need for assessment in a structured, repeatable record.
- Link risk scenarios with likelihood and damage estimates per scenario.
- Aggregate scenario scores into one DPIA risk figure automatically.
- Associate TOMs to each scenario to capture after-mitigation residual risk.
- Recalculate risk automatically whenever a scenario or mitigation changes.
- Manage the consultation process with stakeholder input and prior-consultation tracking.
- Link DPIAs to processing activities, assets, and data categories for full context.
- Bulk import and export DPIA records with status mapping across your inventory.
What it delivers to your program
- Defensible risk figures — aggregate and residual scores are computed consistently, not assembled by hand.
- An assessment that stays current — add a control and the residual risk updates to match what you did.
- Audit-ready on demand — risk, mitigations, and consultation records sit in one assessment you can show without reassembly.
- Faster sign-off — stakeholder input and prior-consultation status are tracked where the assessment lives.
- Unified reporting — DPIA risk connects to the same records, assets, and TOMs used across your programme.
Built for compliance
The DPIA maps directly to the Article 35 obligations your supervisory authority tests against.
| What DPMS does | Maps to | How |
|---|---|---|
| Assesses risk of high-risk processing | GDPR Art. 35(1) | Structured DPIA with processing description and need identification |
| Evaluates risk to data subjects | GDPR Art. 35(7)(c) | Scenario-level likelihood and damage estimation, aggregated automatically |
| Documents measures to address the risk | GDPR Art. 35(7)(d) | TOM associations with after-mitigation residual recalculation |
| Records consultation and prior consultation | GDPR Art. 35(2), Art. 36 | Built-in consultation process with stakeholder tracking |
Why Priverion
Unlike general-purpose GRC tools that treat a DPIA as a static form, Priverion recalculates aggregate and residual risk every time a scenario or mitigation changes — so the assessment reflects the controls you have actually put in place.
Because the DPIA lives inside one unified privacy and InfoSec platform, it draws on the same processing activities, assets, data categories, and TOMs you maintain elsewhere — no re-keying, no parallel copies, one current view of risk.
Questions DPOs ask before a demo
Does the DPIA connect to my records of processing?
What happens to the risk score when I implement a control?
Can I track prior consultation with the supervisory authority?
Can I move existing DPIAs in and out?
Explore related capabilities
Ready to see risk recalculate as you mitigate?
