Assess Each Risk Per Standard, Not as One Global Score
One global score hides the risks each framework cares about
You run GDPR, ISO 27001, NIS2 and SOC 2 across the same estate, but most tools collapse them into one global risk score. A confidentiality scenario that is high risk under GDPR may be a moderate control gap under ISO 27001. A single number hides both.
When an auditor asks how you assessed a risk for their framework, a blended score does not answer the question. You re-derive the per-standard view by hand, in spreadsheets that drift apart the moment a control changes.
The evidence problem compounds it. The same scenario maps to different controls under each standard, each needing its own proof — and tracking that mapping manually is where assessments quietly fall out of date.
What you can do with per-standard risk assessment
- Define scenarios per framework — model one risk distinctly under GDPR, ISO 27001, NIS2 or SOC 2.
- Score risk at the asset/standard intersection so each framework keeps its own assessed value.
- Average risk per scenario across every asset it touches, calculated automatically.
- Map scenarios to standard-specific controls with the evidence that supports them.
- Filter scenarios by standard applicability to focus on one framework at a time.
- Create and publish standard-based treatment plans tied to the scenarios they remediate.
- Add external and custom standards for frameworks beyond the built-in set.
What it delivers to your program
- Answer per-framework audit questions directly — each standard has its own assessed, evidenced view, with no manual re-derivation before an inspection.
- Catch risks a global score hides — a scenario flagged high under one framework stays visible even when it reads moderate under another.
- Keep control evidence current — scenario-to-control mappings live in one place per standard, not scattered across spreadsheets.
- Show defensible treatment — published plans trace each remediation back to the standard and scenario it addresses.
Built for compliance
DPMS helps you evidence the specific obligations that govern risk assessment — mapped to the article and control, never to "the GDPR."
| What DPMS does | Maps to | How |
|---|---|---|
| Assesses risk per applicable framework | GDPR Art. 32 | Scenarios scored at the asset/standard intersection against the standard's risk model |
| Documents risk assessment and treatment | ISO 27001:2022 Clause 6.1.2 & 6.1.3 | Per-standard scenarios, control mapping and treatment plans you publish |
| Evidences control selection per standard | ISO 27001:2022 Annex A | Scenario-to-control mapping with attached evidence |
| Supports sector risk-management obligations | NIS2 Art. 21 | Framework-specific scenario tracking across assets |
Why Priverion
Unlike general-purpose GRC tools that reduce everything to one risk number, Priverion assesses each scenario at the asset/standard intersection — so one scenario carries a distinct value under each framework you run.
Because this lives inside a single privacy and InfoSec platform, scenarios, assets, controls and treatment plans share the same data. Map a scenario to a control once and the evidence flows through to the standards that need it — no re-keying between disconnected risk and compliance modules.
Questions ISOs and DPOs ask before a demo
Can the same scenario have different risk under different standards?
How is risk calculated across multiple assets?
Can I assess frameworks beyond the built-in standards?
Does it handle treatment or just assessment?
Explore related capabilities
Ready to assess risk per framework?
