Score vendor IT-security risk against the controls that matter
A vendor score nobody can trace back to a control
Third-party security is now your security. A supervisory authority, an auditor, or your own board will ask how you assessed a critical vendor — and "we emailed them a spreadsheet last year" is not a defensible answer.
The usual approach scatters the evidence. Questionnaires sit in inboxes, scores live in one analyst's head, and nothing connects a vendor's "yes, we encrypt at rest" to the control behind it. When an answer reveals a gap, no step forces a remediation.
The result is vendor security that looks documented but cannot be evidenced, compared, or acted on when it matters.
What you can do with Vendor IT Security Risk Assessment
- Assess each vendor against the IT-security domain using ISO 27001 questionnaires.
- Link any assessment answer to a remediation TOM, so a gap becomes a tracked action.
- Track an IT-security maturity rating derived directly from questionnaire responses.
- Combine multiple standard evaluations into a single IT risk profile per vendor.
- Filter your vendor list by IT-security assessment domain to see what's been evaluated.
- Search vendors by name with infinite-scroll paging across a large supplier base.
What it delivers to your program
- Answer the auditor on the spot — each vendor's posture is scored, sourced, and tied to controls.
- Turn findings into fixes — answers that flag a gap link to a TOM, so remediation is owned and visible.
- Compare vendors on one scale — standardized ISO 27001 scoring replaces inconsistent one-off forms.
- Defend your prioritization — maturity ratings and IT risk profiles show why one vendor was escalated over another.
Built for compliance
This table reflects how the feature supports each framework; it does not assert certification.
| What DPMS does | Maps to | How |
|---|---|---|
| Assesses vendor IT-security controls | ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 5.19 (supplier relationships) | Questionnaires scoped to the IT-security domain, scored against the standard |
| Documents third-party security risk management | NIS2 Art. 21(2)(d) (supply-chain security) | Per-vendor risk profiles and maturity ratings built from recorded responses |
| Links findings to remediation measures | DORA Art. 28 (ICT third-party risk) | Assessment answers mapped to remediation TOMs for tracked follow-up |
Why Priverion
Most tools stop at a pass/fail score. Here, each questionnaire answer maps to a concrete TOM, so a vendor's weakness becomes a remediation action inside the same control model you use internally.
Unlike general-purpose GRC tools, this assessment lives inside one unified privacy and InfoSec platform. Vendor IT risk shares the same vendors, TOMs, and ISO 27001 standards as your ROPA, DPIA, and internal risk work — no re-keying, no parallel spreadsheet, one source of truth.
Questions CISOs ask before a demo
What standard are vendors assessed against?
Does this just give a score, or does it drive action?
Can I assess against more than one IT-security standard?
How does it handle a large vendor base?
Explore related capabilities
Ready to score your vendors against real controls?
