Run your privacy and security program with traceable tasks, projects, and meetings
Programs fail on follow-through, not strategy
Privacy and security programs don't fail on strategy — they fail on follow-through. A remediation owner changes roles, a DPIA action slips past its deadline, a steering-committee decision lives only in someone's inbox. None of it is connected to the risk it was meant to reduce.
When a supervisory authority or a DORA examiner asks "who owned this control, and when was it closed?", scattered to-do lists and meeting minutes can't answer. The work happened; the evidence didn't.
Spreadsheets, generic task tools, and email threads keep the operational program separate from the risk and assessment records it serves. That gap is where accountability quietly disappears.
What you can do with Task, Project & Meeting Management
- Move tasks through draft, in-progress, and closed states with priorities and deadlines.
- Run projects on a Gantt timeline with linked risk scenarios — not a flat to-do list.
- Log meetings with participants, notes, and the tasks and documents they produced.
- Assign a responsible person and organizational unit to every task, project, and meeting.
- Bulk-update and batch-link items so large remediation programs stay manageable.
- Import from files and export to CSV or JSON for reporting and handover.
What it delivers to your program
- Audit-ready accountability — every action carries an owner, a deadline, and a status an examiner can read.
- Defensible meeting decisions — follow-ups link back to the meeting that approved them, so you evidence governance, not just intent.
- Risk work that closes the loop — projects tie to the risk scenarios they mitigate, so progress is measured against exposure reduced.
- Less coordination overhead — bulk operations and email-driven workflows keep cross-team deadlines moving without manual chasing.
Built for compliance
DPMS helps you evidence the specific obligations that govern your operational program — mapped to the article and control, never to "the GDPR."
| What DPMS does | Maps to | How |
|---|---|---|
| Documents owners and deadlines for security tasks | ISO 27001:2022 Annex A 5.8 | Responsible-person and org-unit assignment per item, with status tracking |
| Links remediation projects to the risks they treat | ISO 27001:2022 Clause 6.1 / 8.1 | Project-to-risk-scenario linking on a Gantt timeline |
| Evidences governance decisions and follow-ups | GDPR Art. 5(2) | Meeting logs with participants, notes, and linked tasks |
| Tracks risk-treatment activities through to closure | NIS2 Art. 21 | Task workflows with priorities, deadlines, and email notifications |
| Manages ICT-risk treatment actions to completion | DORA Art. 6 | Linked tasks and projects driven through defined states |
Why Priverion
Unlike general-purpose GRC tools and standalone project trackers, tasks, projects, and meetings in Priverion link to the same risk, control, and assessment graph as the rest of your program. A DPIA action, the project that delivers it, the risk it reduces, and the meeting that approved it are one connected record — no re-keying, no reconciling exports. The operational layer and the evidence layer are the same system, which is what makes follow-through provable.
Questions teams ask before a demo
Is this just a to-do list with a compliance label?
Can projects show timelines and risk together?
How do follow-ups from meetings stay traceable?
Can we import existing tasks or export for reporting?
Explore related capabilities
Ready to run your program with traceable follow-through?
