Turn "implemented" into a maturity score you can defend
"Implemented" doesn't tell you how mature you really are
You can list every control in your ISMS. What you can't easily say is how well each one is actually implemented — and whether you're closer to your target than you were last quarter.
"Implemented" is binary, but maturity isn't. A control can be documented but not enforced, enforced but not monitored, monitored but not improved. Without a consistent scale, that nuance lives in people's heads and assessor notes, not in evidence.
When an auditor or the board asks "where are we, and where are the weak spots?", you reconstruct the answer from spreadsheets that drift the moment the assessment ends.
What you can do with Control Maturity Scoring
- Score each control on a CMMI 0–5 scale, consistently across your framework.
- Track implementation status per control — not, partially, or fully implemented.
- Average maturity by category automatically, with no manual roll-ups.
- Build maturity scorecards broken down by framework and by control category.
- Compare current versus target maturity to see the exact gap on every control.
- Switch maturity models between CMMI, ISO 15504, and OSIMM to match your methodology.
- Flag controls below target so remediation starts with the controls that move the score.
What it delivers to your program
- Report progress in numbers, not adjectives — give the board a maturity trend they can track over time.
- Walk into audits with the gap already mapped — current-vs-target views replace the pre-assessment scramble.
- Prioritize remediation where it counts — controls below target surface first, so effort lands on the weakest links.
- Defend every rating — a documented, model-based scale shows assessors how each score was reached.
Built for compliance
These mappings show how the feature supports your obligations — they do not guarantee or constitute compliance.
| What DPMS does | Maps to | How |
|---|---|---|
| Scores control implementation maturity | ISO 27001:2022 Annex A | Per-control CMMI / ISO 15504 rating with implementation status |
| Aggregates and measures maturity by category | ISO 27001:2022 Clause 9.1 | Average maturity roll-up across each control category |
| Tracks current-vs-target for improvement | ISO 27001:2022 Clause 10 | Gap analysis flags controls below target for remediation |
| Measures program maturity by function | NIST CSF 2.0 | Maturity scoring across categories using a recognized model |
| Applies a defined assessment scale | ISO/IEC 15504 | Process-capability levels selectable per assessment |
Why Priverion
Maturity scoring isn't a standalone spreadsheet here — it lives inside one unified privacy and InfoSec platform. The controls you score are the same controls tied to your risks, standards, and frameworks, so a maturity rating flows into your wider posture without re-keying.
Unlike general-purpose GRC tools that lock you into a single scale, DPMS supports CMMI, ISO 15504, and OSIMM — you assess on the model your auditors and methodology already expect, and the gap analysis adapts to it.
Questions CISOs ask before a demo
Which maturity models are supported?
Can I see the gap between where we are and where we want to be?
Does it roll maturity up by category?
Does this connect to my controls and frameworks?
Explore related capabilities
Ready to score your control maturity?
